Ratpoison differs from the others you list in that it's centered around offering one giant window at a time instead of around tiling. (As such, so much as a status bar seems like too much eye candy for me.) Posted by 31d1 at 3:29 PM on Octoīest answer: I'm a longtime ratpoison user. Also, Haskell is pretty cool and learning about it is good brain food. But I have a hard time imagining it can beat xmonad. If you're into Lisp, it couldn't hurt to look at stumpwm. ![]() wmii has some issues that awesome addresses fairly well, and ratpoison, the OG tiling wm fails it at the classic problem of tiling wm's, badly behaved apps like Gimp. That said, if you can't hang with xmonad, or are not inclined, awesome is definitely the next best. With a bit of thought, I managed to get a good config without knowing any Haskell (and it is a weird experience to kind of look at other things and guess how you're supposed to say a thing, and have it workmost of the time!), and a few questions in #xmonad helped me understand some of the more cryptic aspects of the language. It also has great documentation - once you figure out wtf it is saying - but it does trick you into writing Haskell, as the wm itself is a bunch of libraries, and your config file actually compiles to the window manager. It works better than the others with weird apps and situations, has amazing contrib extensions, like Xmonad.Prompt and Xmonad.Scratchpad, even integrates beautifully and easily with gnome if you want it to, and is perhaps the only one that has a fantastic and friendly community around it (freenode/#xmonad is full of helpful and friendly people that are happy to handhold noobs). Thank you.Best answer: I've messed with all the ones you've listed except for ion, and despite the barrier to entry xmonad is by far the best. This article is also written to thank the developers and community of Regolith Linux who made my many happy hours of using the computer possible. Overall though, for a newcomer to Linux and keyboard-centric workflows, the pros vastly outweigh the cons, and I can’t recommend it enough. There is still a tiny delay between pressing the keys and opening the terminal, which I think can be improved. Personally, I still wish that Regolith Linux is even lighter and use less RAM. It is what makes Regolith Linux so well designed such that I keep coming back to it. It’s killer feature, in my opinion, is its excellent balance in all 3 areas. Regolith Linux’s advantages - ease of use, smart window management and keyboard-centric workflow - can be found separately in many other Linux distributions. Knowing this, we can minimise context-switching and improve ergonomics by picking up the mouse less, and better get into the flow. However, it is overkill most of the time as many parts of browsing is structured and does not require the free-movement. ![]() It is a free-movement pointer, and combined with buttons, it can do any type of navigation. Personally, I think that the mouse pointer is a single, powerful and general navigation device. Of course, finer interactions like clicking the buttons within a webpage still requires the mouse pointer. Within a web page, I can use the arrow keys to scroll. To focus on the search bar to search again, Ctrl + L is available. To go back a page or forward a page, I use Alt + left/right Arrow. To switch tabs, I use Ctrl + Tab to go right, and Ctrl + Shift + Tab to go left. The following can be done without any extensions. This is about how I use Web Search Navigator. To open a link in a background tab, I can use Ctrl + Space. See the tiny black arrow beside each search result link? You can use your keyboard’s arrow keys or k and j to jump between links ![]() Overall, I find this a bearable experience, but there’s definitely room for improvement. However, we have to spend additional effort to do it. One way we can mitigate the problem is to use the window snapping feature and snap our windows to the left and right of the screen. After a while, we would be Alt-Tabbing through our way to get back to a specific window, sometimes not even to use it, but just to view it. multiple Google Chrome windows, File Explorer, Terminal, Visual Studio Code, and a Word document)? These windows open on top of one another, covering those beneath. This is an okay user interface if we only have a few apps open, but do you have those days where you open many apps (eg. In the traditional user experience found in Windows, macOS and many Linux desktop environments, windows “float” in the desktop and can be moved around freely using the mouse. Floating Window Manager, image courtesy of
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |