X (Ln x)^2 – x Ln x – – ]Īlternate Choice of u and dv u = ^2 dv = 1 Here are two different solutions I was able to get to work and produce the correct answer. Note also this is just what the statement of the problem is on the first line of the tabular form. Note that the bottom entry in the integral (right) column is used twice. There is a nice procedure, called the tabular method. Last line as an integral of the product of the two columns. Such repeated use of integration by parts with a polynomial is common, but it can be a bit tedious. I did some more net searching and found out what I am doing wrong.īriefly, the method asks you to finish the Derivation of the formula for integration by parts. In doing the regular integration by parts for this problem we change what u and v are for the second integral, which makes it so we don't get this infinite series of integrations. A rule exists for integrating products of functions and in the following section we will derive it. (5) is repeated such that the derivative in second column equal to zero. So this is your problem: the tabular method only works if the derivative eventually terminates, which does not happen with this problem, so you can't use it here. Another method is the algorithm of the tabular integration by parts which is. \int u v^Īnother possibility is that u^(n 1)v^(-n) is a constant, and the integration ends there after integrating the constant. A much easier visual representation of this process is often taught to students and is dubbed either 'the tabular method', 'the Stand and Deliver method', 'rapid repeated integration' or 'the tic-tac-toe method. You can show by repeated integration by parts that While the aforementioned recursive definition is correct, it is often tedious to remember and implement. It seems to work mainly for integrals where the du term eventually vanishes or where the integrand ends up repeating itself.ĮDIT: Yes, that's exactly the problem. I don't think the tabular works well for this integral. If you did infinitely many iterations presumably you would get the same answer as regular integration by parts. You just arbitrarily stopped at the third iteration. I don't use tabular integration, but from what I read about it on wikipedia it looks to me like your problem is that you stopped at the x^3 term, but according to the tabular integration recipe you're supposed to keep going until there are no possible pairings left.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |